Showing posts with label herbivores. Show all posts
Showing posts with label herbivores. Show all posts

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Hosts & Beetles: Another Duh? Moment in the Home Bug Garden

Ted MacRae of Beetles in the Bush was kind enough to accept my challenge and supported my tentative guess about the Bronze Aspen Borer (Dicerca callosa) – the attractive jewel beetle (sounds nicer than flat-headed borer) whose genus I misspelled in the 1st edition of What if and What is it? Mystery Beetles of the Moose Pasture posting for the 2nd edition of An Inordinate Fondness that Amber and AJ did such an excellent job of hosting (if you haven’t visited yet, you should for both the beetles and the music). Meanwhile, I’ve found some additional images that may help confirm the identification (from a different time, but looks like the same beetle), and certainly help show why they are called jewel beetles. Ted also complimented me on my use of host information to narrow the field. That’s nice, but now I feel somewhat dumb, since I failed to use such logic elsewhere.

Ted also took a stab at the other mystery beetles, including the difficult (over 40 thousand species are known) members of the leaf beetle family Chrysomelidae. Of particular insight was his suggestion that my ‘another orange & black chrysomelid’ might belong to the genus Phyllobrotica. After much Googling and Bugnetting, I have come to the conclusion that Ted is right and in fact, this particular orange & black chrysomelid is the famous Phyllobrotica decorata - the North American Elegant Four-Spotted Black-bellied Marsh Skullcap Leaf, Flower & Root Eating Beetle (if I may be so descriptive and prolix as to try and outdo the Australian Ant-naming Alan Anderson).

Now that name may incur infamy, but usually such just desserts devolve because ‘leaf beetles’ eat our crops (e.g. asparagus, cucumber, and potato beetles), ornamentals (e.g. the Old World Viburnum Leaf Beetle), and street trees (e.g. the elm leaf beetle). But famous and infamous carry different implications: Phyllobrotica decorata’s fame rests on its diet, but only indirectly through the justly famous paper by Brian Farrell & Charles Mitter published in the journal Evolution (44:1389-1403) in 1990: Phylogenesis of insect/plant interactions: Have Phyllobrotica leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae) and Lamiales radiated in parallel? Not only have I read this paper, but I also assigned it as reading in a class; and yet, I didn’t recognize the beetle. Duh!

Although Phyllobrotica decorata appears to derive its species name from the Latin for ‘elegant’, it can be just as destructive as its pesky relatives – its larvae eat the roots and the adults feed on the leaves and on the sexual organs (aka flowers) of its host. But the host is the Marsh Skullcap (Scutellaria galericulata) – a widely distributed wildflower in the mint family that does very well along the margin of the lake at the Moose Pasture (in fact, if one looks at our pictures of the beetles, one sees that they are eating skullcap leaves!). A closely related 4-spotted species of Phyllobrotica feeds on the same skullcap in Europe and Asia.

According to Farrell & Mitter’s elegant and life-history-filled study, the Phyllobroticae (which more or less means ‘leaves for dinner’) tend to be ‘strictly monophagous’, meaning they tend to feed on only one kind of host plant. Since they feed on members of the mint family, this implies a specialized constitution. If you will recall an earlier posting on herbs, those essential oils we find so refreshing can be toxic and if your entire dinner is laced with them you will soon be a minty corpse. If you can feed on mints without ill-effect, however, not only will you have fresh breath, but at least two other avenues to a better life are open. First, you can eat all you can stomach with little competition from other mint-challenged herbivores. Second, if you can sequester some of those toxic chemicals, then you can make yourself distasteful to those predators that are considering you for dinner. That is the probable reason for the striking orange & black colouration – a warning to predators that you taste bad. Also, according to Farrell & Mitter, these host specialist beetles appear to be somewhat trapped by their specialization. As new species of skullcap evolved, so did new species of Phyllobrotica, but for the most part (one species has switched to mints in the genus Phyllostegia) the Phyllobroticae seem to have been unable to take advantage of other potential hosts with which they moved through evolutionary time.

And now for the double-duh development: the other mystery orange & black chrysomelid was labeled ‘Zygogramma sp.? feeding on willow’. Well, these are some Zygogramma that look a bit like this picture, e.g. the ragweed leaf beetle Z. suturalis, but except for being a little oranger than normal, this beetle is a dead ringer for a member of the Home Bug Garden fauna that I have posted on before, the Striped Willow Leaf Beetle Calligrapha californica. Not only that, but at the Moose Pasture this beetle was all over a composite last Fall – the Nodding Beggartick, Bidens cernua – a known host of the beetle, or at least for the subspecies Calligrapha californica corepsivora Brown which feeds on Coreopsis, Bidens (beggarticks), and Ambrosia (ragweed). Well, eating ragweed is good, but I have several species of Coreopsis in the Home Bug Garden and I’m not too keen on a generalist leaf beetle munching on them. Unlike the simple story the Phyllobroticae tell; however, the Calligraphae are complicated. Calligrapha californica may be a complex of cryptic species or populations with different host specializations. This could be just as interesting a story as with the Phyllobroticae, although much more difficult to work out, but I just hope none of the HBG visitors have a taste for coreopsis.

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Of Bugs and Herbs: Sharing the Wealth

In my experience, unlike vegetable crops (and flowers), the culinary herbs I grow suffer relatively little from pests. Slugs can be a problem (on basil, dill, and lovage especially), but insect pests are few and far between. The only common one I can think of is the small but rather attractive orange mint moth Pyrausta orphisalis. Fluttering adult moths aren’t uncommon, but I find a caterpillar only every now and then, and I can’t say the mint seems to be much put out. And in a sense, knowing the orange mint moth is feeding away is a comfort, because mints (or at least the members of the genus Mentha – the ones we call ‘mints’) tend to be aggressive and invasive. When a mint runner escapes from the contained bed where I planted it and starts running around the tomatoes, then I consider it a weed. But what would it be called if it escaped from my yard? In the following discussion, I will be relying to two sources for most of my information: the USDA Plants Database and the best source I have on herbs in Canada, Ernest Small’s book “Culinary Herbs” (NRC Research Press, 1997).


When a plant appears in an area where we haven’t seen it before or we think it doesn’t belong, it can attract a variety of descriptors. The USDA Plants Database uses a fairly complex classification of introduced plants that ranges from ‘Waif’ (a plant that has wandered away from the garden, but looks like it needs help to survive) to ‘Garden persistent’ (e.g. peonies that survive for yonks around old homesteads) to ‘Introduced’ (i.e. persisting without help), but recognizes that one can’t always be sure if a plant is any of these classes, including introduced or native. A plant species that successfully reproduces and persists is an area is ‘naturalized’ if it is thought to be introduced relatively recently and ‘native’ if it seems to have been here for a longer period. In Alberta, one must always remember that no plants have been established here for longer than about 9-10,000 years and much of we think of as ‘native’ have been here for an unknown but shorter period.

There are native plants we know are ‘native’ and others that may or may not be, or that may consist of mixes of native and introduced types. Chives is an example of the latter. Although today Allium schoenoprasum is a circumboreal species considered a native in northern parts of both North America and Eurasia, i.e. in two areas that were once part of the ancient ‘supercontinent’ called Laurasia, botantists may recognize several ‘varieties’ (var.). Allium schoenoprasum var. sibiricum, for example, is considered native to North America and A. s. var. schoenoprasum is considered an introduced variety that has escaped from gardens and naturalized in many areas (AK, SK, E Canada, N USA). Is this Eurasian variety an invasive species?

I’m not sure why the plants I use as culinary herbs seem to be relatively immune to insect herbivory – one would expect specialist herbivores to do well on them – but perhaps our herbs, mostly of which seem to have moved to North America recently, have escaped their specialist herbivores. This hypothesis, however, does not explain why my ‘native’ herbs – anise hyssop (Agastache foeniculum), tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus), and chives – also seem to be free of caterpillars, sawflies, aphids, flea beetles, and the other pests that do so well on many other native plants. Perhaps this refuge from herbivory may result in part from the protective function of the essential oils that herbs produce. Although we find these oils tasty in small quantities, in larger doses many are extremely toxic. For example, menthol – that ubiquitous chemical that gives mint its cooling aftertaste – can cause gagging and choking in infants and young children. Field mint (Mentha arvensis), a circumboreal species that grows in Alberta, “may be the world’s most important essential oil plant” (Small 1997) – but the high levels of essential oils make this mint especially dangerous to children.

Whatever the cause, the herbs in my garden have suffered more herbivory from me than from any insect. That is good for me, but surprisingly it is also good for the insect fauna in the Home Bug Garden. The mutual benefit to gardener and bug comes from the entomophilic flowering of most of my herbs. With few exceptions (e.g. tarragon), culinary herbs in flower are a cornucopia for pollinators. Much of this bounty results from the origin of many culinary herbs in two plant families (each of which, confusingly, have two official names): the mints (Lamiaceae, Labatiae) and, the umbellifers (Umbelliferae, Apiaceae). Although both families of plants produce inflorescences with numerous small flowers, the tubular, irregular flowers of the mint family require a bit of tongue action to access the nectar and are of most interest to bees and hover flies. In contrast, the open umbels of the umbellifers are visited by a very wide range of insects. These two groups of plants also differ in how readily they make themselves at home outside the garden. In Alberta, at least, non-native culinary herbs in the mint family appear to be restricted to the Garden Persistent stage at best. Basil, sage, rosemarie, and most thymes succumb to the winter. Lemon thyme, peppermint, and hyssop eke by most winters, and summer savory reseeds itself, but that is the best that can be hoped for. Only the native anise hyssop is persistent and seems able to spread. This is not true of the umbellifers.

Umbellifers (including vegetables like the carrot and parsnip) are easily recognized in flower by their often large, umbrella-like umbels of tiny flowers. The umbel is an easy platform for an insect to land on and the field of small flowers requires little skill or learning to exploit. As a result, umbellifers attract a great diversity of bees, beetles, wasps, butterflies, and flies – a greater diversity of insects than any other plants in the Home Bug Garden except the composites (Compositae or Asteraceae), another family that produces compound inflorescences of small flowers. The only composite herb in my garden, however, is French tarragon – with inconspicuous, wind-pollinated flowers.

The largest and most impressive of the umbelliferous herbs in the HBG is lovage (Levisticum officinale). Lovage requires sun and a lot of space – it is a fully hardy perennial that once established shoots up to 2-3 meters every summer. The leaves have a strong celery-like taste and smell, and the young leaves are tasty in salads, soups, stews, and stir-fries. Once the leaves have lost their light green colour, I find them too tough and too intense, but the young flower clusters oozing with nectar are like celery candy. As you might expect from a plant that attracts numerous pollinators to umbels composed of numerous flowers, lovage sets large numbers of ‘seeds’ (actually each is a dry fruit composed of two mericarps, each with a seed). The seeds are excellent in winter soups, stews, and breads.

Lovage also self-sows with abandon, and so can be a bit weedy. In fact, lovage is ‘naturalized’ in Saskatchewan and much of eastern Canada and the NE USA. Based on how well it is doing in my yard, I suspect Alberta too has fallen to its relentless march. Our other perennial umbellifer herb, Sweet Cicely (Myrrhis odorata), also reseeds freely and is naturalized in BC and ON. This tendency to become part of the local flora seems to be strong in the umbellifers that we use as herbs. Annual members of the family like caraway (Carum carvi), coriander (Coriandrum sativum), and dill (Anethum graveolens) are variously ‘naturalized’ or ‘weeds’, depending on how you feel about them, across much of North America. Caraway is one of the few weeds that infest our quarter section in the bush and all four of these herbs come back year after year in my yard.
I’m still fence-sitting the native-exotic divide, so I haven’t decided how I view these new members of the flora. It was a bit disappointing to spend an hour struggling with the picture-less keys in the Flora of Alberta and then end up with caraway. But, it was an interesting plant before I knew what it was and I don’t feel any need to weed it out. I’m tempted to dither on the divide until I can catch Cane Toads: The Conquest. Perhaps enlightenment awaits in the new 3-D Avatoad.

Monday, June 8, 2009

March 1, 2159 or Pollinators Not



This morning the clock in the train station claimed it was March 1, 2159. Well maybe it meant that is the earliest we can expect warm weather. In any case, it gives me an excuse to follow up the post on pollinators with one on pollinators not, and display a few more Bug Garden visitors.

Not every arthropod ones finds in a flower is searching for nectar or pollen. Lots of them are there for another kind of feed. That can be interesting, especially if you like predatory insects like the Damsel Bug above, or spiders:





Or it can be disconcerting if you are hoping for fruit or seeds. But the toll that predators take on pollinators is unlikely to be of much importance in yield. Much more insidious are those that have nothing but bad intentions.



I remember how pleasantly surprised I was, that first Bug Garden Spring, at the extraordinary diversity of of sawflies that were visiting flowers. Except for diprionids long ago when I was a forest entomologist, I can't say that I ever had much experience with that branch of the Hymenoptera and I was entranced. Well, now I know better and I've come to an accommodation with most. A few leaves here and there are a small price to pay. The ones that defoliate the currant, columbine, and creeping jenny, though, get a population reduction treatment. They are messy buggers to squish between the fingers, but that's life.






And there are a few of these non-pollinating flower-visitors that are just too attractive not to like, like the tephritid fly below. We have planted lots of goldenrod for the late-summer colour and pollinators, but we don't mind hosting a few gall flies too.